Answer:
c. $11,480
Explanation:
Given that
Cost recovery allowed Cost recovery allowable
Year 1 $16,000 $8,000
Year 2 $9,600 $12,800
Year 3 $5,760 $7,680
The computation of gain should Tara recognize is shown below:-
Cost $40,000
Less:
Greater cost of recovery
allowable or allowed
Year 1 $16,000
Year 2 $12,800
Year 3 $7,680 $36,480
Adjusted basis $3,520
Gain to be recognized = Residual value - Adjusted basis
= $15,000 - $3,520
= $11,480
So, for computing the gain to be recognized we simply deduct the adjust basis from residual value.
Option D, These countries experience diminishing returns to physical capital per worker with technology and human capital per worker being fixed
Explanation:
The curve which represents the relationship between physical capital per employee and production per employee illustrates the value of human capital per employee and technologies.
Both Albernia and Brittania have decreasing returns on physical capital as the same incremental rises in physical capital per employee in both countries — continuous job retention in human capital and technology — will lead in smaller and less actual GDP changes per employee.
So, Both human capital per worker and technology are held fixed. Yes, there are diminishing returns.
Answer:
D. The constant growth model cannot be used for a zero growth stock, where the dividend is expected to remain constant over time.
Explanation:
So, we evaluate each option.
a. We discount the dividends by the required rate of return. So incorrect.
b. The dividend yield is annual dividend per share divided by stick price per share. the 5% is the growth in dividend and not the actual dividend itself. So, incorrect.
c. The constant growth is appropriate for companies whose dividend patterns are stable. Startups have multiple stage growths and this option becomes incorrect as constant growth is not applicable.
d. A zero growth stock is one where dividend remains the same. So when there is no growth in dividend, the constant growth model becomes inapplicable. So, the statement is correct.
So, here we have our correct statement and all others are incorrect.
Answer:
Annual Income is calculated by multiplying the Hourly wage by 4,000 hours.
The Difference between annual wage and federal poverty line is calculated by deducting the 2019 Poverty threshold of $13,011 from the Annual Income.
The Difference between annual wage and median household income is calculated by deducting the 2019 Median household income of $68,703 from the Annual income. Negative balances are highlighted.
Answer:
The right answer is "Pure monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly".
Explanation:
- The agricultural market system would be fundamentally competitive as well as is often called straight-up competitiveness.
- Agriculture would be ideal competitiveness even though it has a vast variety of industries and every company generates a small proportion of the overall production of such marketplace.
Thus the above is the correct answer.
