<u>L</u><u>a</u><u>w</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>f</u><u> </u><u>E</u><u>x</u><u>p</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>e</u><u>n</u><u>t</u>

Compare the terms.

Therefore, a = -2 and n = 3. From the law of exponent above, we receive:

<u>E</u><u>x</u><u>p</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>e</u><u>n</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>D</u><u>e</u><u>f</u><u>.</u> (For cubic)

Factor (-2)^3 out.

(-2) • (-2) = 4 | Negative × Negative = Positive.

4 • (-2) = -8 | Negative Multiply Positive = Negative.

If either denominator or numerator is in negative, it is the best to write in the middle or between numerator and denominators.
Hence,

The answer is - 1 / 8
Answer:
1/12
Step-by-step explanation:
Okay, so this will be a compound probability question because there are two parts to the question.
Firstly, a die has 6 sides, and there is only one chance of getting a 1, so the probability would be 1/6.
Furthermore, there are 3 different even numbers on a 6-sided die, so that is 3/6, which can be simplified to 1/2.
Now, because this is a compound probability, we have to multiply 1/2 and 1/6 together, which would give us our answer of 1/12.
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.