Answer:
This is all the information I could find.
Answer:
an inflationary increase in the price level.
Explanation:
Monetary policy can be defined as the actions (macroeconomic policies) adopted and undertaken by the central bank of a particular country to control the money supply and interest rates so as to boost or enhance economic growth. The central bank uses monetary policies to manage inflation, economic growth through long-term interest rates and level of unemployment in a country.
In order to boost economic growth, a monetary policy is implemented to increase money supply (liquidity). Also, it is used to prevent inflation by reducing money supply.
An inflationary gap, also referred to as an expansionary gap in economics, is typically used for measuring the difference between the gross domestic product (GDP) and the current level of Real Gross Domestic Products that exists when a country's economy is gauged at a full employment rate. Consequently, this situation causes the price of goods and services to go up with a low income level among the people living in the country.
A budget deficit is the amount by which spending exceeds income.
All other factors held constant or all things being equal (ceteris paribus), an increase in government's budget deficit drives the interest rate up.
Generally, when there's a deficit in government budget, they resort to issuing more bonds or borrowing money from creditors. These creditors are likely to be sceptical about the government's ability to repay the debt and as such would increase the interest rate.
Hence, an inflationary increase in the price level of goods and services is not much of a danger if the U.S. economy is producing at a level that is substantially less than potential gross domestic product (GDP) and the aggregate demand is being increased by government's budget deficits.
You actually can cause it wasn’t far alone in the relationship
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
$8.75
Explanation:
The sales tax is on non-grocery is 7%
Sales tax on an item costing $125 will be
=7% of $125
=7/100 x $125
=0.07 x $125
=$8.75
