Answer:
<em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>helpful</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em><em><u>☆</u></em>
God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
Answer:
Fictitious payee rule
Explanation:
Fictitious payee rule applies when a person cause an instrument to be issued to a person(payee) who has no valid reason to receive the payment or no interest in the instrument, this ensure forgery of the payee's name will then be effective to pass the instrument to the transferees later as we can see in the case of Maria, she included the name of her maid for the purpose of using the check for herself and not for the sake of Carolyn
Is that supposed to be a question?