<span>In the question asked,
since the underlined word is undetermined. If the underline word is “<u>were staying</u>”
only this would probably mean only a simple predicate. Notice that the phrase
structure is only composed of a linking verb and the word verb or rather gerund
“staying”. Contrarily, if the underlined word is “<u>were staying at a cozy
little cabin in the mountains</u>”, this would indicate a complete predicate.
Which entails the linking verb the verb and the situation which describes the
sentence. </span>
And no Marvell, if they were thus joyefull, seeing wise Seneca was so affected with sailing a few miles on he coast of his owne Italy; as he affirmed, that he had rather remains twentie years on his way by land then pass by sea to any place in a short time; so tedious and dreadful was the same unto him
The central conflict and its resolution in "To Build a Fire" is:
c. The man is in conflict with the extreme weather; the conflict ends when the man freezes to death.
Even though the man had conflicts with other characters in the short story, their conflicts arise from the central conflict of man needing to learn how to build a fire in order to keep warm amidst the extremely cold weather.
Shifting the focus to how the author needs his mother's support at the end of the argument might be considered an example of false causation fallacy.
Explanation:
In case of false causation the causes of the fallacies are incorrectly identified. In this case although one event is related to another event and the events take place at the same time . Although if the events are talking place at the same time but the events are not connected to each other. In case of false fallacy real relationship do not exist between the variables . One of the example of false causation is that whenever I go to the the bed at night for sleep , sun also goes down as well.
