Answer:
Hello your question has some missing part below is the missing part
Yashari’s monthly take-home pay is $1850. What percentage of her paycheck will go toward student loans if she chooses standard repayment? Does that payment amount seem reasonable? Why or why not?
answer :
14.43% of his paycheck
The payment amount is reasonable ( $ $32035 )
Explanation:
Subsidized loans = $7000
unsubsidized loans = $19000
Annual earnings = $27,000
Monthly pay = $1850
<u>solution </u>
If Yashari chooses the standard repayment the percentage of her paycheck that will go for repayment will be 14.43% while the interest rate will be 4.3%
Therefore the total repayment will be $32035 which is a reasonable amount
<u />
<u />
<u />
<u />
<u />
Answer:
The appropriate journal entry to record the March purchases of shares under the employee share purchase plan are as follows:
Debit: Cash ($12 × 85%) × $50,000 = $510,000
Debit: Compensation Expense ($12 × 8%) × $50,000 = $90,000
Credit: Common Stock = $50,000
Paid in Capital – Excess of Par ($50,000 × $11) = $550,000
Answer:
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= 3.223 Times
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= 3.91 times
Explanation:
Inventory Turnover Ratio= Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventories
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= $632,000/ $201,000
+ 191,100/2
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= $632,000/196,050
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2008= 3.223 times
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= $ 731,000/191,100
+ 182,600/2
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= $ 731,000/ 186,850
Inventory Turnover Ratio for 2009= 3.91 times
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
When supply is perfectly inelastic, the supply curve is vertical as shown in the attached plot. Thus, the tax that shifts the supply curve upward would have no effect on the equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumers. Since equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumer don't change there's no burden on them. However, no team's owners would receive a lower after tax price and thus bearing the entire tax burden.
Answer:
- Single asset = Coefficient of Variation
- Portfolio = Beta
Explanation:
When dealing with standalone risk, coefficient of variation is best because it shows the amount by which the asset's returns might deviate from the average returns of the market.
As for portfolio assets that are well diversified, the best measure would be beta because diversified portfolios deal with systematic risk and beta shows the movement of the portfolio in relation to the market and so will show that systematic risk.
