Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry to record the given transaction is as follows
Retained earning Dr (0.30 million × $54) $16.2 million
To Common stock (0.30 million × $1) $0.3 million
To Additional paid in capital in excess of par (0.30 million × $53) $15.9 million
(Being the stock dividend is declared)
The computation of the shares after declaring the dividend is
= 30 million × 1%
= 0.30 million
Answer:
Imports is 50.
Current account balance is -30.
Total savings is 30.
After tax reduction total savings is 10.
Explanation:
GNP is given as 100.
The consumption expenditure is 70.
The investment expenditure is 40.
The government spending is 20.
The exports are given as 20.
GNP = C + I + G + EX - IM
100 = 70 + 40 + 20 + 20 - IM
100 = 150 - IM
IM = 50
The current account balance is the difference between exports and imports.
Current account balance
= EX - IM
= 20 - 50
= -30
Total savings in the economy is the difference between disposable income and consumption.
Total savings
= Y - C
= 100 - 70
= 30
In case government reduces taxes, the private saving will increase while the public saving will decrease.
Private saving
= Y - T - C
= 100 - 10 - 70
=20
Public saving
= T - G
= 10-20
= -10
Total saving
= Private saving + Public saving
= 20 + (-10)
= 20 - 10
= 10
Answer:
$3,225
Explanation:
The computation of the amount reported as an ending inventory is shown below:
Date Particulars Units Cost Amount
1 -1 Op Balance 1,000 $1 $1,000
1 -7 Purchases 600 $3 $1,800
Total 1,600 $1.75 $2,800
($2,800 ÷ 1,600 units)
1 -20 COGS 900 $1.75 $1,575
Total 700 $1.75 $1,225
1 -25 Purchases 400 $5 $2,000
Ending inventory 1,100 $2.9318 $3,225
($3,225 ÷ 1,100 units)
We simply added the purchase units with the opening balance and deduct the cost of goods sold units from the opening balance so that the correct ending inventory amount could arrive
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
