your answer will be the last one
Answer:
a
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
b

c
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
d
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are are told that
The variance is
The sample size is n = 30
The sample variance is
The level of significance is
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the chi distribution table the critical value of
at a degree of freedom of
is

=> 
Gnerally from the values obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
The answer is legs
The side away from the right angle is the hypotenuse
If there is a specified angle you are looking at
The "hypotenuse" of that angle would be the opposite, and the one that is not the actual hypotenuse would be the adjacent
The answer to this question is 600-28w > 300. This inequality can be described as $600 (money in the savings account) subtracted by $28w (withdrawal of $28 a week for food) should be greater than $300. It proves that the money will not drop below $300.
I’m pretty sure the answer is C