1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
4 years ago
14

Drag & Drop: Order these rational numbers from least to greatest

Mathematics
2 answers:
Iteru [2.4K]4 years ago
6 0

No sé nada de esto, solo quiero los puntos, así que no se enoje conmigo por tener que publicar algunas preguntas, traduzca esto y, a cambio, responderé una pregunta realmente seria. entonces byeeeeeeee

geniusboy [140]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

-9.3

-7.2

2.05

2.3

4.06

4.32

4.35

21.3

Step-by-step explanation:

negatives go 1st. the bigger the number would be positive means its a smaller negative. then you just order the positive numbers least to greatest

You might be interested in
Write a different expression that has the same quotient as (−3)/8 and −(3/8) .
Assoli18 [71]
-3/8=-3/8times2/2=-6/16
6 0
3 years ago
No trolls i need help asap please!!!
kari74 [83]

Answer:

These triangles cannot be proven congruent

Step-by-step explanation:

The 3 angles in ∆FGH are congruent to the 3 corresponding angles on ∆ABC.

These mean that the two triangles have the same shape and we can conclude that they are similar to each other.

However, knowing just the 3 angles is not enough to prove that both triangles are congruent to each other. This is because, for two triangles to be congruent to each other, all 3 angles and 3 sides of one triangle must be congruent to the corresponding 3 angles and 3 sides of the other. That is, they have the same shape and size.

Therefore, the triangles given above cannot be proven congruent.

3 0
3 years ago
Thank you so much have a great day you guys are the best whoever helped me!
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

Congrats!

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Round the following numbers to the nearest tenth 26.425
k0ka [10]
26.4 because .42 you have to leave the 4 the same since the 2 is not greater than 5.
8 0
4 years ago
Fuaad solved an absolute value inequality and expressed the solution as . What is another way to show Fuaad’s solution? For all
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

{x I - 12 < x < 7}

Step-by-step explanation:

Fuaad solved an absolute value inequality and expressed the solution as - 12 < x < 7.

So, the value of x lies between - 12 and 7 but not including - 12 and 7.

Option C will give another way to show Fuaad's solution.

It is {x I - 12 < x < 7}, which means x is a variable which belongs with in the interval (- 12, 7). (Answer)

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tem 205193 Which is the value of 3b<br>2 – b when b = 5?​
    7·1 answer
  • Select all that apply
    6·1 answer
  • Help plz I really don't get it
    15·2 answers
  • the slope on the line below is -4 use the coordinates of the labeled point to find a point slope equation of the line
    14·1 answer
  • Please help!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • I will give brainlyest if you help me with this
    7·2 answers
  • Write the standard form of the equation of the line through the given points.
    10·1 answer
  • Mr. Thomas has some erasers. When he gives 4 erasers or
    14·1 answer
  • (3_4sin²a) (sec²_4tan²a) =(3-tan²a)(1-4sin²a)<br>​
    10·1 answer
  • Say true false .<br>empty set is the subset of any set​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!