1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
3 years ago
10

If, by examining your family history and DNA, you could tell how long you would naturally live and which, if any, genetic condit

ions you would develop, would you want to know? Explain why or why not and whether you think access to this knowledge would be beneficial or detrimental to human advancement.
Biology
1 answer:
aev [14]3 years ago
8 0
Well my family has a genetic condition but i wouldnt want to know about my chances of catching it. I would rather remain blind to how long and enjoy how long my life lasts. I wouldnt want to know because then I would feel like I have a time limit. By not knowing I can enjoy every breath i take. Also by not knowing I wont have to worry my kids about me. Like last time I had a cold they called a doctor and scheduled an appointment just for a few sneezes and coughs. Also if I told my kids then they would feel like they have a time limit on their lives to. I am just going to live my life to the best. Plus if anything does happen to me I am only like two minutes away from a hospital.
You might be interested in
Create a chart comparing the parts of a cell to an automobile production line.
Igoryamba
Ksksksksskksksksksksksksksksksksks

4 0
3 years ago
This tissue's function is to transport water from the roots to the leaves.
erastovalidia [21]

Vascular tissue

whoop

3 0
3 years ago
Which environment would have the most erosion?
Black_prince [1.1K]
A deciduous forest or a sandy beach
7 0
3 years ago
Movement of any particle or molecule from higher concentration to lower concentration is called _____
Ket [755]
C. Diffusion.
The particles move WITH the concentration gradient
6 0
3 years ago
Which practice would most likely be considered an unethical treatment of an animal during a scientific research research study ?
Fiesta28 [93]
Killing them would be unethical, actually animal cruelty. Unethically changing them in anyway that would harm them would be unethical. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is the United Kingdom planning to use driverless cars beginning in 2015?
    14·2 answers
  • DOES BURNING FOSSIL FUELS PUT CARBON DIOXIDE IN THE ATMOSPHERE?
    10·2 answers
  • What forms a meshlike network that entraps red blood cells, platelets, and plasma to form a blood clot?
    9·1 answer
  • Which type of rock would most likely be weathered by acidic groundwater to produce a cave? *
    5·1 answer
  • Organelle first process for photosynthesis and cell respiration
    5·1 answer
  • What are psychological constructions
    13·1 answer
  • 4. Using the Key The Great Plains states have been
    8·1 answer
  •  The Asthenosphere is part of which layer of the Earth?
    15·1 answer
  • how could measure whether or not the chemical reaction that breaks down hydrogen peroxide is occurring
    10·1 answer
  • Which brain nucleus is a relay station for sensory information traveling to the cerebellum, especially for proprioceptive inform
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!