5. Explaining How did colonial powers govern their colonies?

History

2 answers:

seropon [69]3 years ago

8 0

<h2>The colonial powers governed their colonies by both direct and indirect rule. But they favored direct rule.</h2>

Explanation:

The chief goal of the colonial powers was to have superior firepower, equipment and resources that made the Europeans a formidable enemy.

They want to utilize the natural resources of the lands and create markets for their own manufactured goods. They favored direct rule, which was more efficient.

Colonial policy emphasized on export of raw materials, which resulted in increase of agriculture.

Western powers focused on bringing the blessings of Western civilization to their colonial issues.

The Europeans could easily manipulate different tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from growing up.

charle [14.2K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

How did colonial powers govern their colonies? The chief goal of the colonial powers was to exploit the natural resources of the lands and open up markets for their own manufactured goods. They either used indirect or direct rule. ... Colonial policy stressed export of raw materials, which led to plantation agriculture

Explanation:

You might be interested in

The main reason Florida works to provide improved access to medical care is because of the state's large number of

AleksandrR [38]

A is your answer

Hope this helps!

6 0

2 years ago

Please help meee!!!!!

Lynna [10]

Answer:

1) Abraham Lincoln faced the collapse of the union and the abolition of slavery as president

2) Jefferson Davis (1808-1889) was a Mexican war hero, U.S. senator of war and president of the confederate states of war and president of the Confederate states of America for the duration of the American Cilvil War

3) Davis faced difficulties throughout the war as he struggled to manage the southern war effort maintain control the confederate economy and keep new nations united.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

How does the democratic government differ from the oligarchic government

horsena [70]

<span>Usually, we hear people say that "The United States of America (for example) is a republic and not a democracy." You ask; what is the difference? The word "republican" applies to the character of the nation-state.A monarchy, for example, is not a republic. Saudi Arabia is a monarchy. Russia is a republic. The government of a monarchy invested in the King. The King is empowered by God. The government of republic can take many forms such as elected representative democracy or single-party communist state. But a republic draws its authority from the people. Democracy is having the character of the people. A republic that is based on democratic principles draws its authority from the people. A republic can be democratic or dictatorial. North Korea is a republic. Its full name is "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea." Even dictators thrive to be seen as democratic, even when they are not. The "Islamic Republic of Iran" has dozens of supposedly democratic institutions and elections. Fundamentally though those choices are limited to the people by the theocratic nature of the government.Iran is actually a Theocracy where a state religion rules. It may be important to realize that this issue is not a question another countries that either is well schooled in Government in general and/or do not have two major political parties namedRepublicans and Democrats.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

30 POINTS!!!!!!How did the Underground Railroad work?

Simora [160]

The answer would be all of the above

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Supporters of the New Jersey Plan

nikdorinn [45]

Supporters of the New Jersey Plan did not want the number of representatives sent to Congress to be proportional to the number of citizens in a state, which would give an advantage to the more populous states.

5 0

2 years ago