Neither, but if he was alive during the Civil War, he would have sided with the South.
They had<span> all sorts of goods that the British wanted. These included things like spices, textiles, cotton, and the opium that the British </span>would<span> sell in China to be able to buy tea. Because </span>India had<span> so many people and so much wealth, it was the "</span>jewel in the crown<span>" of the British Empire.
Hope this helps!</span>
Actually, yes, it happens everywhere. most of the time some people believe in their own beliefs and get too hard headed and shallow to even process that not everyone has the same beliefs/practices that doesn't mean they're right nor wrong just different. like Atheism & Christianity; its a huge topic people discuss that usually always turns heated.
The near advisors to Kennedy claimed that the development of Eisenhower's foreign policy was stultified, slow-moving, too dependent on brinksmanship and major retaliation, and complacent. First, Kennedy provided the green light to a 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba launched by Eisenhower.
Explanation:
- Cold War is the global state conflict, Kennedy's foreign policy was governed by American disputes with the Soviet Union, represented through proxy contests. Like his antecedents, Kennedy embraced the containment policy which sought to halt the extent of communism.
- Concerned about the political and economic effects of the incursion, Eisenhower called for the withdrawal of Britain and France.
- Amid the crisis, Eisenhower introduced the Eisenhower Doctrine, according to which any nation in the East might petition the United States military forces for American economic assistance or aid.
Broadly speaking, Mercantilism was very good for European countries for a while but terrible for their colonies.
Mercantilism made people in the Old World VERY rich and this made the Colonists angry.
As a result, the colonists started to push back and eventually rebelled.
