3 years ago

Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?

2 answers:

alexandr1967 [171]3 years ago

7 0

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States states:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

From the given options, the option D is the most likely interpretation of the second amendment i.e. There should be no limits on owning and using guns. The point highlighted in rest of the options is not listed anywhere in the amendment.

Therefore, the correct option is D.
<span>There should be no limits on owning and using guns.</span>

Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the correct answer is D: There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Explanation:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You might be interested in

20 points Quickly

Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks -- slaves as well as free -- were not and could never become citizens of the United States. ... The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

True or false? James II was removed from the throne of England by Parliament and replace with William and Mary because James, th

cricket20 [7]

True, sorry if I’m wrong

5 0

3 years ago

Read this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence: That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,

klio [65]

C. Citizens must be allowed to overthrow a government that does not protect their rights.

5 0