Answer:
2) Chemotherapy for cancer patients
Explanation:
Chemotherapy for cancer patients is a basic necessity needed for the patient to continue living, so if the price of chemotherapy increases or decreases will not affect the patient's choice of getting it. What can affect the patient's decision is whether he/she can afford the treatment, but even if he/she can't they will seek other ways of trying to obtain it, e.g. going to public hospitals.
Option (b) for a response. In order to keep the expenditure multiplier from exceeding 1, output must increase while consumption must decrease.
<h3>Spending multiplier: What does it tell you?</h3>
An economic indicator of the impact that changes in government spending and investment have on a nation's Gross Domestic Product is the expenditure multiplier, often known as the fiscal multiplier.
<h3>When the multiplier is negative, what does that mean?</h3>
The negative multiplier effect happens when a spending leak or initial withdrawal from the circular flow has further impacts and a larger final decline in real GDP.
<h3>Why does multiplier exceed 1?</h3>
The rise in the national product indicates a rise in national income. Consumption demand rises as a result, and businesses produce to satisfy it. As a result, the increase in investment is greater than the increase in national income and product. There is a multiplier effect that exceeds one.
Learn more about expenditure multiplier: brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe it's "a decrease in income if good X is an inferior good"
Explanation:
If the price is decreased people are more likely to buy it. If people have more money they are more likely to buy more thinks including good X. An increase in popularity with good X is sure to make more people want to buy it, so the second option is the only one that really makes sense.
Answer:
Keep the cattle and recover the contract price from Esau
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that the Double D Ranch and Esau enter into a contract on August 1 for selling of 200 cattle.
But Esau cancels the contract after 10 days. Now the Double D Ranch is not able to sell the cattle to the another buyer so in this case , the Double D Ranch should keep the cattle and get back the price of the contract from the another party i.e Esau as he cancels the contract
