Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
One pretty straightforward answer could be investment to physical and human capital. But if you are if you are working with a mathematical model the answer to your question depends on the specific model. For example, in an equilibrium model from economic theory, you could find the determinants of labour productivity by taking the partial derivative of the production function with respect to the amount og labour.
Answer:
These two different proverbs mirror social-psychological research that has demonstrated that people in Asian cultures have a more interdependent concept of self than do Americans
Explanation:
According to these two statements, the Asian culture believes more in self than Americans do. These two proverbs showing that people of America and Japan work and believe in these proverbs and they also believe that if they follow these or work according to these proverbs than they are on the right path of their successes while Asian thinking and culture is different from these two countries. Asia culture believes in more self dependency and self motivation.
Answer:
A. I and II
Explanation:
Women’s needs and impact on the environment are two aspects that sustainable development projects take into account when planning the project. Women's needs implies that the project should not be gender biased. On the other hand, the impact on the environment is of prime importance because all of life's actions affect the environment either positively or negatively.
Luther was very much against the practice of indulgence, which granted pardon for certain sins if the people paid the church. He felt that it was wrong to relieved and forgiven by God through a monetary based contribution. Also, he felt that the Pope did not carry the right to grant a pardon for people, and that they should have to undergo the same steps towards repentance just like everyone else.