Answer:
Acitivy B should be crashed first by 2 days and Activity B has a crash cost per days of $25, it will be crashed for a total of $50.
Explanation:
activity A =
normal time (NT) = 5 days
Normal cost (NC) = $0
crash time (CT) = 3 days
Crash cost (CC) = $500
crash cost per day = [CC - NC]/[CT - NT] = $250/day
activity B:
normal time (NT) = 6 days
Normal cost (NC) = $0
crash time (CT) = 4 days
Crash cost (CC) = $50
crash cost per day = [CC - NC]/[CT - NT] = $25/day
activity C:
normal time (NT) = 8 days
Normal cost (NC) = $0
crash time (CT) = 3 days
Crash cost (CC) = $1000
crash cost per day = [CC - NC]/[ CT- NT] = $200/day
The activity that takes the least cost to speed up is the first one to be crashed. from the computations, activity B takes the least cost to speed up, so the project manager should crash activity B first by 2 days.
Therefore, Acitivy B should be crashed first by 2 days and Activity B has a crash cost per days of $25, it will be crashed for a total of $50.
Being smart and being decisive.
Fund only individual citizens; fund only projects for states and localities
Solution :
It is given that :
Amount of investment or the principle amount , P = $ 100
Time of investment , t = 6 years
Rate of interest compounded annually r = 6 %
Therefore the future amount of this investment in a 6 year time is given by,





Therefore, after 6 years the investment of $ 100 will give an amount of $ 141.
Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.