Answer:
Cloud Security Alliance
Explanation:
Cloud Security Alliance can be regarded as an organization that
is a not-for-profit one having a mission in raising best practices that provid security assurance in cloud computing as well as provision of education on how cloud computing can be used in
securing forms of computing. It should be noted that Cloud Security Alliance
is an organization that has developed resource documentation for CSPs and their staff. It provides guidance for privacy agreements, security measures, questionnaires, and more.
Answer: location economies
Explanation:
location economies are economies which are birthed through performing a value creation activity in an optimal location for that activity wherever in the world it may be. It is used by firms to determine the competition in an environment when locating to do business
Answer:
On $6000 amount customer be taxed
Explanation:
given data
total invest = $10000
current value = $16000
to find out
On what amount customer be taxed
solution
we know customer is invest here total $10000 and
current value is now $16000
so we can say that here payment non qualified deferred, annuity after tax
so tax are paid of earning
so earning = current value - invest
earning = 16000 - 10000
earning = $6000
so on $6000 amount customer be taxed
D, because automatic withdrawal is a schedule payment that takes place without either party having to do a thing as long as the account covera the balance.
Answer:
That the car wash was not liable to the plaintiff because the car wash employees had no notice they were taking responsibility for so much jewelry.
Explanation:
The case of Ziva Jewelry Inc., v. Car Wash Headquarters Inc involved a salesperson Stewart who locked jewellery in his car and took it to the car wash.
He did not disclose that there was expensive jewelry in the car.
The attendant finished washing the car and signalled to Stewart that his car was ready and walked away from the car.
Before Stewart could pay the bill someone had taken the car. Although the police recovered the car the jewellery was stolen.
Zeva Jewellry filed a motion against the car wash that they did not excercise due care in returning the vehicle.
In this instance the car wash was not liable because Stewart did not disclose there was expensive jewelry in the car.
Also the attendant had finished with his car and informed him of this. So it was out of their care when the car theft occured
