Answer: Repetitive-part learning
Explanations: Repetitive-part learning can be simply defined as a method used in learning new skills where an individual learns a part of the skill and practice, then a second part of the skill is learned, part one and two are combined together and practiced and then a third part is introduced which has to be learned and combined with the previous ones and practiced, the process will continue in this sequence untill all part are learned, combined and practised as a whole and mastered.
This allows individuals to learn the small details in each skills.
Dividing the golf swing skill acquisition into different components and having his students learn each component independently before combining all the components to practice a complete golf swing is a good illustration of Repetitive-part learning.
Scientists were interested in testing a new technique to prevent slipping on ice one group simply wore boots, while the other group wore socks over their boots.
Option: C
Explanation:
Scientist always try to bring out a new technique to solve out some problems like to prevent or avoid slipping on ice scientist followed a method that is they divide the whole group into two sub parts one having simple boots while other group having socks over boots.
In this way scientist want to watch and experiment the effect of not wearing boots and having boots with socks that affect the slipping over ice. If both the groups wore same shoes then the experiment would not work out properly. Two different techniques must be followed by the scientist.
Option (A) is the correct answer.
The choice which best explains a narrative technique the writer uses and its effect on the reader is the writer's extended reflection creates a cohesive narrative.
<h3>What choice best explains a narrative technique the writer uses and its effect on the reader?</h3>
- A writer's communication of ideas to their audience and the techniques they employ to build a story are at the heart of narrative techniques.
- Metaphors, hyperbole, and alliteration are common literary devices that can be used in the fashion or when the language was chosen to tell a story.
- Backstory and foreshadowing are common techniques that can be used to create the sequence of events that make up a narrative.
- It is not a "narrative" until a writer decides how to express that tale in language.
- Many important storytelling devices can be categorized into one of four groups: plot, individual, point of view, and style.
Hence, the writer's extended reflection results in a unified story, and this option best describes a narrative style the writer employs and its impact on the reader.
To learn more about the Narrative technique refer to:
brainly.com/question/18832542
#SPJ4
Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.
