Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
because it'll have positive x and y intercepts
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
By process of elimination, we can eliminate:
- <em>A:</em> <em>y = 3x - 1</em>
- <em>C: y = 3x + 1</em>
- <em>B: y = -3x</em>
<em>A and C</em> don't work because the given line has it's y-intercept at the origin, therefore, no y-intercept is written. <em>B </em>is not it either because the line <em>does not</em> go <em>down</em> from <em>left to right</em>, therefore, the slope is <em>not</em> negative.
The answer is <em>D: y = 3x</em> because since the line goes <em>up</em> from <em>left to right</em>, the slope is positive, and the y-intercept is the origin, so the equation will have no b.
Answer:
622.27
Step-by-step explanation:
- $87.45 + (- $24.76) + (-17.29) = $-129.5
$143.87 + $348.90 = $492.77
492.77 - (-129.5) = 622.27
Answer:
2^5>4^2
Step-by-step explanation:
hopefully this makes sense
:)
3s + 4j = 360
1s + 3j = 220
This one we can solve using substitution, in that
s + 3j = 220 implies s = 220 - 3j (subtract 3j from each side).
Now substitute into the first equation:
3(220 - 3j) + 4j = 360. Solve for jackets.
660 - 9j + 4j = 360 [Distributive property]
660 - 5j = 360 [Add -9j + 4j]
Subtract 360 from each side, and add 5j to each side.
660 - 360 - 5j + 5j = 360 - 360 + 5j
300 = 5j
Divide each side by 5.
$60 = price of a jacket.
Three of these plus a shirt runs $220.
3(60) = 180
180 + s = 220
180 - 180 + s = 220 - 180 [Subtract 180 from each side]
s = 40
Now we double check.
3(40) + 4 (60) = 120 + 240 = 360. This satisfies the first equation.
We could check the second one too, but I'm satisfied.