Answer: False
Explanation: I read about it :3
Answer:
They would have to work harder to have drinkable water and it would take a toll on their trade
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
A "culture boundary" is actually a word used in human geography, whereas a "political boundary" is an arbitrary line dividing one political unit.
A political boundary is a hypothetical line that divides one political unit, like a nation or state, from another. These can occasionally line up with a river or other natural geographic feature to form a boundary or other barrier between nations. Political lines frequently develop along borders between nations or states. As an illustration, the Alps divide France from Italy, while the Pyrenees form the border between France and Spain.
In reality, anthropology and human geography already use the phrase "cultural barrier." It is typically used to indicate a geographical area where a population of people shares similar cultural traits, such as language, religion, and traditions.
To learn more about Political Boundaries refer to:
brainly.com/question/1802615
#SPJ1
This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
