Answer:
In 1894 a car company cut its workers already low pay by about 25% causing the workers to strike and boycott the company. This effected railroads nationwide bringing american business to a halt. It also allowed the workers to voice their demands as a group. So for the most part, the boycott was successful, but the boycott did have some cons too. Many of the strike workers lost their jobs, and the new hired workers conditions didn't improve. Also, the unions leader was jailed, and the federal government had to get involved to stop the strike. The boycott was successful, but it came with many downsides.
Explanation:
I just had this question on edgenuity
This was said by Mother Teresa before she died. So no later than 1977.
Resources, knowledge, money and possibly some allies
For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
Radical criminology and peacemaking criminology
