The conflict in "Little Brother" is external and is characterized by the man versus society type.
<h3>What is conflict in a story?</h3>
- It is a disharmonious situation between the character and some elements.
- It is a combat between the protagonist and another element.
The external conflict takes place outside the protagonist's mind, that is, it is combat, a disharmonious situation between the character and an element present in the outside world. This element could be another character, a group of characters, or even an element of nature.
In the case of "Little Brother," the conflict occurs when the Department of Homeland Security accuses the protagonist of carrying out a terrorist attack in the city. As the Department of Homeland Security is formed by a group of people, we can say that this conflict is a man versus society type.
Learn more about literary conflicts at the link:
brainly.com/question/11405642
#SPJ1
According to Sections 27 and28, the procedure that the two methods of treating the sick have in common is Breathing on the patient.
<h3>How would you tell about the breathing process to a patient?</h3>
When a person or a doctor is said to inhale (breathe in) inside their patient nostrils or mouth, air tend to enters their lungs, and oxygen from that air is said to be transmitted or moves to your blood.
Note that At the same time, carbon dioxide, and other waste gasare said to often moves from the blood to the lungs and is then said to be exhaled (breathed out).
Hence, the The Europeans and Indigenous Americans both had used this methods in treating the sick.
So, According to Sections 27 and28, the procedure that the two methods of treating the sick have in common is Breathing on the patient.
Learn more about Indigenous Americans from
brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ1
Answer:
Janice studied for her exam, therefore she did well.
The county school board should adopt a strict but realistic absentee policy for students
So I totally just got this from this website this is not my answer but I found it:
Quick Answer
Hamlet hesitates to kill Claudius because he believes that Claudius is praying. If he were to be killed right after praying, when his soul is at its most pure, Claudius would go directly to heaven—and Hamlet wants to be sure he sends him to hell. But Hamlet can't hear what Claudius is actually saying; Claudius admits that he cannot fully repent of his murder of King Hamlet, because doing so would mean giving up his crown. So, technically, Claudius's soul is not pure, and Hamlet could have killed him in this moment, but Hamlet doesn't know this!
Detailed Answers:
Hamlet doesn't kill Claudius at this point because he believes that Claudius is praying. He says that killing the king NOW would be "hire and salary, not revenge!" He simply cannot send Claudius to heaven, where he would surely go were he killed just after praying and purging his sins. He thinks that would not avenge his father's murder, because Claudius killed Old <u>Hamlet</u> without giving him the opportunity to pray, and therefore, Old Hamlet must spend time in hell. Hamlet thinks killing Claudius when he is fit for heaven would be like paying Claudius for the murder of his father. That simply would not do.
The real irony is that Hamlet does not realize that his revenge could have been complete if he had actually killed the king then and there, because Claudius was not really praying. Oh, sure, he was on his knees, but Claudius says that he knows he cannot be forgiven for the murder unless he truly repents, and repentance would mean giving up his crown and queen. So when Claudius says "My words fly up, my thoughts remain below./ Words without thoughts never to heaven go," he is really admitting that he knows he isn't forgiven. If only Hamlet had known, then Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Leartes, Gertrude and Hamlet all could have survived.
This is the website: https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/end-act-3-scene-3-why-didnt-hamlet-kill-claudius-2709
