<span>This is an example of the concept of linguistic relativity. Most linguists currently believe that language can influence certain cognitive processes. Linguistic reality is being researched in a variety of academic fields to determine the effects on a speakers' world view and thought.</span>
Answer:
below
Explanation:
To answer this question, we must first define "amnesty" to be based on something we can argue about. Amnesty, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is when a person or group in authority pardons a individual (or group of individuals) of a offense that they have done. The next thing we need to define is "undocumented workers". Undocumented Workers, as defined by WorkPlace Fairness, is not having met the requirements to be able to secure a citizenship or a permit, but is allowed to have working rights in the United States.
The question that is being asked here is whether or not illegal immigrants should be allowed to continue to work and live in a "legalized" status. In my opinion, they should not be allowed to be given amnesty. Remember, they are here for only to work, and if there is no other thing interfering with them being able to live inside their country (such as civil war, famine, persecution, etc.), they should continue to go through the same channel as others. Amnesty should only be granted to those who are in desperate need of it, and not to just anybody outside the country.
The North Sea, a part of the Atlantic ocean
I believe the answer is: Wernicke's aphasia
Wernicke's aphasia refers to a form of illness that make the victim unable to properly decipher both writing and verbal lanugage. This abnormalities occurs when we somehow damage our brain in the broca's area, which took part in the left hemisphere of the brain.
Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
