Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
L=R*angle, but the angle *must* be in radians. So, just translate 43 degrees into radians: 43 * pi / 180, and you'll get:
L = 42 * ( 43 * pi / 180 ) ~ 31.504666, which rounded to the nearest hundredth is 31.50 cm.
Answer: 
<u>Move all terms to the left</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u>Add all the numbers together, and all the variables</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u>Multiply elements</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
<u>Move all terms containing d to the left, all other terms to the right</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
Answer:
54.79 because if it's 4 and lower, you let them stay the same but if its five and above you let them go higher.
Answer:
yes correct
Step-by-step explanation:
given
5x ≥ 3x + 4 ( subtract 3x from both sides )
2x ≥ 4 ( divide both sides by 2 )
x ≥ 2 ← is the solution to the inequality
The only value greater than 2 is 3