Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
Answer:
The answer is: D) The quotation is incorrect: A decrease in price causes a decrease in quantity supplied, not a decrease in supply.
Explanation:
A decrease in the price of a product or service will always decrease the quantity supplied and increase the quantity demanded of the product. The terms supply and demand apply to the entire curve, not an specific point in them.
For example, the equilibrium point for milk is 5 million gallons sold at $3 each. If the government suddenly decides that it will place a price ceiling for milk at $2 per gallon (may use argument that it is a necessity good essential for the well being of children) the quantity demanded for milk will rise but the quantity supplied will fall.
That is because not every dairy business will be able to produce and sell milk at $2 and still make a profit (or meet their expected profit levels), so they will either lower their milk production (make substitute products) or go out of business.
Answer:
The transformational leaders are bureaucratic and charismatic are people oriented in nature.
Explanation:
- The charismatic leaders are also called as the transformational leaders and shares various things.
- Charismatic leaders make their status better and transformational leaders focus on the transformation of the organization's vision. The main difference is the focus and the audience.
- The charismatic leaders are committed and have engaging personalities like martin Luther king as his speeches were often more tangible than other leaders and used to have a huge influence on the people he met.
- The charismatic leaders are more emotionally attached to their audience. They work towards an emphasis on the greater good. More people-oriented.
Answer:
$60,000 or $12,000
Explanation:
1. Since Zack expects Sparky to use the developed software for a period of five years, we could assume that the revenue for the first year of the contract would be $60,000.
2. Or if we Spread out the average revenue for a period of five years from the licensing fee, 60,000 / 5 (years) would give us 12,000 dollars per year.
It’s D, marketing research