Answer:
$544.265
Explanation:
Given:
FV = $1,000
Yield to maturity = 5.2%
N = 12 years
Required:
Find the value of the zero coupon bond.
Use the formula:
PV = FV * PVIF(I/Y, N)
Thus,
PV = 1000 * PVIF(5.2%, 12)
= 1000 * 0.544265
= $544.265
The value of the zero coupon bond is $544.3
At least $2 per bag as most airlines don't pay.
Answer:
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 70.55 (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Number of year = 7
Pre-tax net returns (Fn) = $100
Growth rate = 4% = 0.04
Inflation = 3% = 0.03
Marginal tax rate = 30% = 0.3
Discount rate = 10% = 0.1
Computation:
Fn = Fo(1+g)ⁿ = 100(1.04)⁷
Fn = 131.6
Nominal net returns = 131.6(1.03)⁷
Nominal net returns = 161.85
After tax return = 161.85 (1 - 0.3)
After tax return = 113.30
After-tax, risk adjusted discount rate = 0.1(1-0.3) = 7%
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 113.30
(1+0.07)⁻⁷
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 70.55 (Approx)
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Economists argue that rent control is a highly efficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living. The statement is False.
<h3>What is Economists?</h3>
An economist refers an individual who possesses deep knowledge about the connection between the production that takes place with the help of resources and the output received to determine the growth.
Rent control is a highly efficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living is False. The quantity of legal rise would be limited by rent control, and most landlords support these rules.
Therefore, the statement is False.
Learn more about Economists, here:
brainly.com/question/13372876
#SPJ2
economists argue that rent control is a highly efficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living. True/False.
