Answer:
Social Facilitation
Explanation:
Social facilitation refers to a situation when a person perform better in doing a certain job/task when other people are around to witness the performance.
Typically, this can be explained by people's desire to maintain positive social status. When other people see your performance you tend to put more effort in order to impress other people in your social group.
In the example above, We know that Samantha has an easier in controlling her diet when she's alone.
But when she's eating with her friends, she experience a certain form of social pressure that make her want to maintain a certain social status. If for example, all her friends are eating a certain type of foods or drinks, she might feel afraid that her friends will consider her to be rude or weird if she's not doing the same.
Answer:
Many Christians believe that baptism is important because Jesus was baptised, and after his resurrection he told his disciples that they should be baptised too. It was John who baptised Jesus. Many Christians believe that baptising cleanses people from original sin.
Explanation:
Ulysses S. Grant was the leader of the union army
Answer:
restriction of range
Explanation:
In an examination of the relationship between SAT scores and college performance, your text authors note that one of the factors that may contribute to the appearance of a low correlation is <u>restriction of range</u>. Restriction of range occurs when observed sample data are not available across the entire range of interest. The impart of this on correlation is that when data have restricted range of score, it causes a reduction in correlation coefficient.
If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
