Well there are many differences, there was only one room, and it only held one class all day, and there was no grades, like k-12, it was all one class, I hoped I helped!!
Not hypothesis, observation
Answer:
Overbreadth Doctrine
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.
Answer:Sharecroppers hoped to save money and eventually buy land of their own.
Explanation:But success depended on uncertain weather conditions and the ups and downs of crop prices. Even a large crop might not pay the bills if crop prices were low at harvest time. In fact, sharecroppers often became locked in a cycle of debt.
Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
