The answer is positional inequality.
The correct answers are treatment; depression levels.
Answer 1: The independent variable (IV) in this study is the treatment the clients receive; that is, whether or not they received <span>cognitive-behavioral treatment. An IV is an experimental variable in a study that is controlled and manipulated in order to measure its effects on dependent variables or outcomes.
Answer 2: </span>The dependent variable (DV) in this study is the clients' depression levels. DVs refer to outcome variables or results that are obtained as a result of manipulating an IV. In this instance, the manipulation of the IV (whether the participants received cognitive-behavioral treatment or were instead wait-listed) led to the DV- clients' depression levels. Specifically the researchers were investigating whether receiving the treatment had an influence on clients' depression levels.
Answer:
Social-Cognitive Perspective
Explanation:
Social-Cognitive Perspective is usually considered the ability to reproduce observed behavior. This type of learning is distinguished from other types of learning because it is based on imitation and, therefore, in the fact that without it such behaviors would hardly be apprehended.
Answer:
instinct
Explanation:
Sigmund Freud identifies two main drives that regulate and motivate behavior, Eros, and Thanatos.
They are the equivalents for drive to live and drive to die. They shape the later emotions, thoughts, and actions that form human experience.
<em>He sees energy created by life will be called libido, proposedly to oppose the force of the ego, which constantly mediates our desires.</em>
<em>He writes, in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Sigmund Freud Eros as the life instinct, including all relating to sexuality and the opposing Thanatos, referred to as a death instinct.</em>
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
