Answer:
embezzlement
Explanation:
the act of withholding assets for the purpose of conversion of such assets, by one or more persons to whom the assets were entrusted, either to be held or to be used for specific purposes. Embezzlement is a type of financial fraud
Answer:
well By its very nature of being a public institution, public education is political. It is vital for educators to understand the influence of politics—not just in education, but throughout our nation and globally—and, therefore, the need for discussing politics in the classroom.
Explanation:
hope it helps
good day ✌️
The Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
<h3>
What is the Fourteenth Amendment?</h3>
- The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was ratified as one of the Reconstruction Amendments on July 9, 1868.
- It was proposed in response to issues concerning former slaves following the American Civil War and is widely regarded as one of the most consequential amendments.
- It addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law.
- The amendment was fiercely contested, especially by the defeated Confederacy's states, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress.
- The first section of the amendment, in particular, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, serving as the foundation for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion (overturned in 2022), Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage.
- The amendment restricts the actions of all state and local officials, as well as those acting on their behalf.
Therefore, the Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
Know more about the Fourteenth Amendment here:
brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ4
"case law", or precedent.
Answer:On January 12, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires that federal sentencing guidelines be advisory, rather than mandatory. 1 In doing so, the Court struck down a provision in law that made the federal sentencing guidelines mandatory 2 as well as a provision that permitted appellate review of departures from the guidelines. 3 In essence, the Court's ruling gives federal judges discretion in sentencing offenders by not requiring them to adhere to the guidelines; rather, the guidelines can be used by judges on an advisory basis. 4 As a result of the ruling, judges now have discretion in sentencing defendants unless the offense carries a mandatory sentence (as specified in law).
Explanation: :)
