1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seropon [69]
3 years ago
10

Alice and Bertie are the beneficiaries of a trust established for them by their father, Chester.

Law
1 answer:
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
5 0
I think it’s a carrot
You might be interested in
Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells
Setler [38]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Belva has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Belva tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.

Is Belva guilty of any degree of homicide?

Answer:

Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.

Explanation:

As we can see in the question above, Belva planned to crash Eddie's car. She premeditated this attack even though she knew it would be dangerous and that it would compromise her and his life. This causes Belva to be indicted for first-degree murder.

This is because, first-degree homicide is one in which the individual plans to attack the other and that attack results in death.

Belva planned to attack Eddie, for this reason, Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.

4 0
3 years ago
a. Which underlying theory about the purpose of law do you feel makes most sense and why—consensus or conflict theory?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

The consensus theory because all individuals have a say, not just the dominant class in power.

<h3>What is consensus theory?</h3>

Consensus theory of law argues that the criminal justice system should work cooperatively to produce justice, as opposed to competitively. In this system, majority of citizens in a society share the same values and beliefs.

Unlike the conflict perspective, it does not suggest that the crime definitions to be controlled by those with wealth, power, and social position in society.

In the consensus model, criminal law is made for the benefit of the whole society.

Learn more about the consensus model here:-

brainly.com/question/8698180

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Harvey is a resident of California. Harvey files an action in Orange County Superior Court, California against Microsoft allegin
enyata [817]

Answer:

They would not win the motion.

Explanation:

Due that Harvey is a resident he can file it their.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt?
Sedaia [141]

The statement that contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt provided is that the "European demands for laborers in the New World."

This is evident in the fact that Queen Isabella said, "I command you to compel and oblige the said Indians to deal and associate with the Christians of the said island, to work in their buildings in collecting and mining gold and other metals, and to grow food and supplies for the Christian settlers and inhabitants of the said island."

The excerpt was culled from the letter of Queen Isabella to Nicolas de Ovando, governor of Hispaniola, in the year 1503.

During this period, the governor of Hispaniola in the New World sees the need for laborers in New Spain.

Queen Isabella made the Decree on Indian Labor, which approved the forced labor of Native Indians by the Spanish.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that at some point in New World, the Spanish saw the need for laborers to helped them settle in the continent.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8364655

3 0
2 years ago
What would happen if you do not obey the law and then not obey a SWAT officer
shutvik [7]

Disobeying a law order of a police officer carries higher penalties to those who refuse to follow orders lawfully issued by an officer of the law. It’s a second-degree misdemeanor, meaning its punishable by up to 60 days in jail, six months of probation and/ or a $500 fine.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • __________________ is a body of law developed because of legal tradition and court cases.
    13·1 answer
  • ___ Is a state of drunkenness or similar condition created by the use of drugs and alcohol
    14·1 answer
  • Due process protections under the 5th Amendment include all of the following except:
    8·1 answer
  • Que es la participacion ciudadana
    7·2 answers
  • The shift in Canada WW1 and after that year, PLEASE HELP VERY EASY WRITE A PARAGRAPH
    7·2 answers
  • Anna nicole smith
    11·1 answer
  • Congress can print money but cannot issue licenses. States can issue licenses but cannot print money. What constitutional princi
    10·2 answers
  • What is the concept ethics ?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements most accurately describes the Supreme Court's rational for the decision in McDonald v. Chicago
    9·1 answer
  • How does America's stand on hate speech compare with other countries' positions on the issue?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!