Answer:
The last one if it says to add and the second one if it says to subt.
Hope this helps!!
Step-by-step explanation:
The fuel economy of the vehicle at 65 mph can be determined using the given equation. The fuel economy, y, can be solved by substituting the car's speed, x, to 65. Doing this, will result to y = 36.5988. Thus, the correct answer among the choices is that the fuel economy of the vehicle at 65 mph is about 37 mpg.
<span>Thank you for posting your Math question here at brainly. The line segments that are necessary to be connected to each point is 34. The total number of such connection is C(35,2) = 35 * 34/2. I hope the answer helps. </span>
The expression given is ambiguous according to the standard rules of math (PEMDAS) due to the lack of appropriate parentheses and probably the exponentiation symbol ^.
From the context, I assume it to mean
(3^(1/3)) / (3^(1/3)) = 1
Since 3^(1/3) is the cube-root of 3, and is thus irrational.
However, the quotient is exactly 1, which is a rational number.
The example is therefore a counter-example for the statement that "set of irrational numbers is closed under division", or stated differently,
"<span>the set of irrational numbers is not closed under division"</span>
Answer:
yes...
Step-by-step explanation:
