Benefits- The people have choice in who runs the country and which laws to place, and No rash decisions can be made without confirmation from multiple parties
Challenges- the first voting of the new leader, and setting up representatives for the new government
It flows both north and south but the best answer would be north
During times of war, some businesses may wither, others may flourish. The market for weapons, perhaps, would have a booming sales performance. This would attract people to come and work for them instead because they would need labor force. However, after the war has died down, people will stop buying these goods. It's time for them to rebuild their businesses. They would have to cut off expenditures to allocate for rebuilding. The easiest pool of expenditures for company owners are the wages. So, as a result, they would lay off workers. In the worst case scenario, businesses would have no way of paying the workers because they would go bankrupt.
Therefore, the answer is: <span>Too many businesses went bankrupt following the war..</span>
Answer: First, Montesquieu thought that the primary exercise of powers could durably be divided only where those powers differed in kind. Second, Montesquieu failed to recognize the lawmaking character of executive and judicial exposition of existing law.
Explanation:
