Answer:
B
Explanation:
I think it was this it is just a guess but I believe this is the right answer bc of the Chinese revolution in the 19th century.
Answer:
D) Trade can keep countries from specializing in producing certain goods
Answer:
I believe that the answer is ("C")
Explanation:
because they're trying to build their neighbors up,making tariffs on them.....
Spanish & English colonization processes (1450-1800) were similar and different: Political: both had specific governing system. Spain's was Council of Indies. ... spanish viceroys held broader power, english colonies had local governments. Social: slaves made up a lot of population, both shipped in african slaves.
Hopes this helps you.
Answer:
“I do think that if there were a long term—I don’t know, 18, 20 years, something like that, and it was fixed—I would say that was fine. In fact, it’d make my life a lot simpler, to tell you the truth.” – Justice Stephen Breyer1
“The Framers adopted life tenure at a time when people simply did not live as long as they do now. A judge insulated from the normal currents of life for twenty-five or thirty years was a rarity then, but is becoming commonplace today. Setting a term of, say, fifteen years would ensure that federal judges would not lose all touch with reality through decades of ivory tower existence. It would also provide a more regular and greater degree of turnover among the judges. Both developments would, in my view, be healthy ones.” – Future Chief Justice John Roberts2
The rules governing the U.S. Supreme Court must be updated to reflect the reality of life in modern America. The average tenure of a Supreme Court justice has significantly lengthened since the establishment of the federal judiciary in the 1700s, giving outsize power to nine individuals in a way the framers of the Constitution could never have imagined. This longevity has resulted in a lack of regularity in vacancies, introducing further randomness to the judicial selection process. As a result, the confirmation process for the highest court has become politically divisive, with extremely narrow votes and theatrics from the nominees themselves. This state of affairs is untenable; policymakers must address it by enacting legislation to create term limits for justices.
