Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
<span>Systematic indoctrination of fresh associates in the tradition's basics, regular recurrence of central costs through higher managers and team associates, and usual rituals honoring associates who show required cultural behaviors</span>
Answer:
Allocation rate Machining= $50 per machine hour
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated Machining cost= $4,000,000
Estimated Number of machine hours= 80,000
<u>To calculate the allocation rate for the Machining department, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Allocation rate Machining= total estimated costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Allocation rate Machining= 4,000,000 / 80,000
Allocation rate Machining= $50 per machine hour
Answer:
7.65%
Explanation:
required return = (percent of stock x required return on stock) + (after tax cost of debt x percent of debt) - adjustment factor
Percent of debt = 100 - 73 = 27%
(12.1 x 0.73) + (3.79 x 0.27) - 2.2 = 7.65%
