Answer:
In the first past the post system, as the name implies, the party or candidate winning the a plurality of votes obtains all the political seats being contested.
For example, suppose we have three parties, and 20 seats being contested in a fictional election. The results are:
Red party - 60%
Green party - 30%
Blue party - 10%
Under a first past the post system, the Red Party would obtain all the 20 seats.
Under a proportional system, on the other hand, each party or candidate gets a proportional amount of seats corresponding to the percentage of the votes.
For example, if the number of seats contested is 20, and we obtain the same results as above, the number of seats for each party (in bold) would be:
Red party - 60% - 12 seats
Green party - 30% - 6 seats
Blue party - 10% - 2 seats
Answer:material rewards
Explanation:
Material rewards refers to being given things that are tangible , something that you can actually point at like physical support of her friends bringing their own trucks and physically helping her unpack.
Usually rewards are given to people because they also have been good like Tara has probably been a great friend to her friends and as a result they give her physcal material rewards in a form of physical assistance.
Answer:
A huge dust storm that caused dry soil to blow, creating a 'black blizzard'
Answer: Social markers of difference.
Explanation: The social markers of diffence are a field study of social cience, with the goal of explain how the inequalities and hierarchies of all people are developed by the human history. The groups of people who are discriminated or disadvantage by the course of time are the focus in this social area.
Social markers of difference, beyond a study, is a form to help discriminated or disadvantage people know your own story and, even more, recognize yourselves as a important piece of the society puzzle, and to claim your rights in the right and effective ways.
Studies such as these make it possible to see more directly how worked theories are extended to society in the form of fostering public policies.
Many of the recent reflections on the production of difference and analysis of social inequality have been putting forth the articulation between the so called "social markers of difference". In this broad field - that involves debates on differential rights, acknowledgement policies, the production of new sensibilities, and at the same time the reformulation of past forms of exclusion - the intersection between race, nation, sexuality and gender is high lightened.
