Idek But you can help me right
There will be a greater amount of ads on social media websites since more users can be targeted with them.
Answer:
Choose CareCo.
Explanation:
Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.
A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs
Answer:
It will take 2.73 years to cover the initial investment.
Explanation:
<u>The payback period is the time required to cover the initial investment:</u>
Year 1= 0 - 2,400= -2,400
Year 2= 1,600 - 2,400= -800
Year 3= 1,100 - 800= $300
<u>To be more accurate:</u>
(800/1,100)= 0.73
It will take 2.73 years to cover the initial investment.
Answer:
Consider the following explanations
Explanation:
a. The whole argument is based on the controlling of different factors such as age, education and occupation among males and females. Now, this is very subjective how they have controlled occupation. For e.g. – Which all occupation they have considered for as stressful job, which all jobs they have considered as physical tiring jobs. Working in a refinery may be physical tiring job but then working in IT Company can also be tiring.
Therefore since there are lot of factors at play apart the one considered to calculate ratio’s we can say that these differential percentage points can always be more than or less than of what presented in question.
b. The same logic has to be applied to (b) as well. When we say that discrimination account for less than 8 percent of differential we implied to say that occupation nature may have more than 12 percent of differential. Now, if you use above logic and applied from occupation point of view.
