Answer: Interestingly enough, there has always been a Wilsonian strain in American foreign policy, an idealistic belief in self-determination, and in some ways it was suppressed during the Cold War ”1 Thus, contrary to President Wilson’s ideas and the public opinion of the early 1900s, war still exists and will continue to exist. However, the objectives, or at least the public’s perceptions of American foreign policy, have taken on a new role. Americans have typically been idealists. Idealism has been present in the American mindset from its founding days and to an extent in American foreign policy; however, under President Wilson’s leadership, idealism took on an expanded role in American foreign policy.
Woodrow Wilson said on the eve of his inauguration “that his primary interests were in domestic reform and that it would be ‘the irony of fate’ if he should be compelled to concentrate on foreign affairs.”2 Fate would have it that President Wilson would lead the United States through the greatest war the world had ever seen. Although Wilson had limited leadership experience in foreign affairs in 1914 when war broke out in Europe, he knew how things should take place.
Explanation:
i looked it up:)
AAA<span> was </span>unconstitutional<span>, but the basic program was rewritten and again passed into law. Even critics admitted that the </span>AAA<span> and related laws helped revive hope in farm communities. Farmers were put on local committees and spoke their minds. Government checks began to flow.</span>
brought back to life or activity or brought back to life or activity
Answer:
The Spanish colonization affected the native americans in many ways. The Spanish brought foreign sicknesses that killed a good amount of the natives population, they took land in their mining expeditions, they took natural resources, and they forced the Natives into slavery and forced them to practice the Christian religion.
Explanation:
The Spanish and Native relationship changed in many ways throughout their whole experiences together, mostly negative changes. When the Spanish arrived in America the illnesses they carried with them were things they had already experienced therefore they had adapted to be immune. The Natives had not been exposed to these illnesses though so they were impacted by them greatly. The land the Spanish took in their mining trips was taken forcefully. Since the Spanish were taking so much land the Natives were losing land and therefore also losing the natural resources they needed to survive.
Corrupt leaders made the democracy of Rome compromise itself and led to monarchy and then sometimes to ruin
Explanation:
The Democracy of Rome had many intricacies that excluded a number of people from ever participating and made it in a way an exclusive group that could ever hope to hold political power.
This made it easier for the government to be very corrupt and they had very little accountability.
The people became dissatisfied and thus many times supported the foundation of monarchy or even found the city in state of civil war multiple times in centuries.
