<span>Contingency tables are the most common way of showing both marginal and conditional distributions. Reading them is quite easy and intuitive, and often the graphical part of the analysis is left at that. Taking a step further, one can translate the table into a chart: it is advised to use a bar chart to effectively show the data</span>
In a condition where Gina induces Hugh to enter into a contract for the purchase of a condominium about which Gina knowingly misrepresents a number of material features, Hugh can rescind from entering into the contract on the basis of fraud when he discovers about the truth of Gina's wrongful intentions.
<h3>What is the significance of a fraud?</h3>
A fraud can be referred to or considered as a situation that arises when either of the parties to a contract is unaware of the wrongful intentions of the other party at the time of entering into the contract.
Therefore, the significance regarding a fraud has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a fraud here:
brainly.com/question/12285524
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
To demonstrate respect in communicating with individuals with access and functional needs you should have good communication skills
Answer:
-$144,000
Explanation:
Cash flow from financing activities
Payment to retire bonds payable -$361,500
Proceeds from borrowing at bank (note payable) $217,500
Net cash used by financing activities -$144,000
The payment made to retired bond payable reflects the outflow of cash so we deducted it and the borrowing at bank is a cash inflow so we added it
And, the rest items are not relevant. Hence, ignored it
