Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of comparative advantage, a person or a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that good as compared to the other commodity is lower than the other country.
For example:
There are two countries; Country A and Country B. There are two goods to be produced; Computer and bottles.
Suppose the opportunity cost of producing a computer in Country A is 4 bottles and the opportunity cost of producing a computer in Country B is 6 bottles.
Therefore, the Country A has a comparative advantage in producing computers because of the lower opportunity cost of producing it.
Answer: True
Explanation: The IT department of an organization is responsible for managing everything related to technological resources and would not necessarily be related to the company's own activities, but they have to work hand in hand to provide the best technological solutions.
For example: a food distribution industry, should have good resources in inventory technology, or in GPS system for transport, are technological resources but are not the same as business.
Yeah that’s what it means
In this case the perfect tender rule
b. does not apply.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule has certain exceptions where it cannot be applied to the tender parties and the probates of the tender.
If there is a government ruling against the use of certain products that are necessary for the tender to be completed and the outlaw happens after the tender is signed but before it is completed as a consignment then it cannot be done.
This would come under the ambit of an emergency where the governed ruling makes such deals null and void.
Answer: B. Cats in a bag
Explanation:
oligopolistic firms is a small number of firms who realize that they all constitute such a small number of firms that they enjoy a lot of power together. so together they are cats in a bag.
