Below are the <span> two reasons why the data might not support the hypothesis:
</span><span>
1) The hypothesis was wrong
2) The data is wrong
A hypothesis is a proposed thought that may clarify a perception or marvels. It is confirmed by testing it. In the event that the information bolsters the theory, at that point, we view the speculation as checked and genuine. Assuming, be that as it may, the information does not bolster the speculation or discredits it, at that point the theory is in a bad position, and we need to concoct an alternate speculation to clarify the perceptions.
</span>
Answer:
the customer is prohibited from buying these securities
Explanation:
In the situation being described the statement that would be true is that the customer is prohibited from buying these securities. This is because intrastate offerings are security offerings that can only be purchased in the state in which it is being offered in and only by permanent residents of that state. Seeing since the customer in this scenario has his permanent residence in Colorado and not Montana, then he cannot purchase this offering.
Answer:
COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS for the sale of and payment for goods.
Explanation:
In simple words, The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), originally released in 1952, is among a series of Uniform Laws developed as legislation with the aim of harmonising selling as well as other business activity rules throughout the United States by some of the implementation of UCC by all of the 50 states , the District of Columbia, as well as the American Territories.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Brazilian tomato producers are worse off.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good and service if its opportunity cost of producing that good and service is lower than that of its trading partner. So it is better off for a country that has a lower opportunity cost in production a good or service to specialise in that good or service.
Brazil has a comparative advantage in coffee production, meaning, it is better off in specialising in the production of coffee and will be worse off if Brazil specialises in Tomato
Mexico has a comparative advantage is Tomato, meaning, she is better off in specialising in Tomato and worse off if she specialises in Coffee
I don't think so check with boarder security in Poland
