Question

HELP ME ASP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE I WILL GIVE BRAINLEST! PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? this is a constitutional matter because the reporter is saying she can write what she wants because of freedom of speech.

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? How do you know? it is a statute law because a statute law is when a legislature makes the law.

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer.
I think that in this case that the law was there to ensure that the public did not get involved in matters of not only the state but of the military, I have been told many times that telling or contacting someone (when in the military) is bad because you can not give the location away it has to stay a secret.

Do you think the reporter has a valid argument? In other words, should the government change the law or make an exception? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. 
I think she overstepped her boundary with this one because it is against the military law that someone from the outside world should know about the things they are doing. and if you ask why is then that is because They do not wish to give info to the public so in case there are spies from other countries they can stay a secret. so I think what the reporter did was very wrong and even if she has the right to speak what she thinks, what she thinks and what she said where wrong and went ageist the law.