Answer: B. $40,000, $960,000
Explanation:
The long term obligation will be 80% of the collateral value which will be:
= 80% × $1.2 million
= 0.8 × $1,200,000
= $960,000.
Therefore, the short term obligation will be:
= $1,000,000 - $960,000
= $40,000
This action could have been caused by writing off an uncollectible account.
A write-off can be described as the removal of an accounts receivable that cannot be collected which was put in the general ledger.
If an account is uncollectible, then it means that the amount that would not be collected would be eliminated. It also means that a previous allowance balance is going to get reduced.
Read more on brainly.com/question/23306803?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Suppose a firm has been losing money and thus is not paying taxes, and this situation is expected to persist into the foreseeable future. In this case, the firm’s before-tax and after-tax costs of debt for purposes of calculating the WACC will both be equal to the interest rate on the firm’s currently outstanding debt, provided that debt was issued during the past 5 years.
Answer:
. D. print U.S. Treasury securities and distribute them to banks
Explanation:
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
