The given phrase means that a person with bad temper never gets better or change with age nor does a sharp tongue changed. Instead, a sharp tongue or someone who is constantly nagging only gets better with the constant nagging.
The given phrase is from Washington Irving's "Rip Van Winkle". The story revolves around Rip Van Winkle and how his 'sleep' in the woods resulted in a loss of years where everyone had seemed to be gone while he was asleep in the woods.
- The phrase was spoken by the narrator while describing Rip Van Winkle.
- The phrase <em>"a tart temper never mellows with age"</em> means that a person with a sour or even a bad temper never changes with age.
- This, in other words, means growing old has nothing to do with a person's change in attitude or temper.
- Likewise, the continuing phrase <em>"a sharp tongue is an only edged tool that grows keener by constant use"</em> also refers to a person's character or attitude.
- The phrase meant that someone who is good at nagging or complaining only gets better with constant use of the mouth/tongue.
- This means that a person who's constantly nagging will only find better words and actions to further the nagging.
The given phrase is a metaphor that the speaker made to highlight a person's behavior, attitude. This phrase can be seen or found in Irving's short story.
Learn more about Rip Van Winkle here:
brainly.com/question/14389121
Answer:
White Fang is curious and brave, but he is also young and inexperienced. He is curious about the fire, which he has never seen before, and he is brave to crawl close to the fire and inspect it. However, his lack of experience causes him to move too close to "the unknown," which shows how little he knows about life in camp. White Fang is curious and brave, but he is also very inexperienced.
Explanation:
I did it on edg. and goy it right
The response provided considers the appeal to logic, to character, and to emotion in the analysis, as expressed in options A, B, and C and explained below.
<h3>What is a rhetorical appeal?</h3>
A rhetorical appeal is a strategy used in order to convince one's audience of something. There are three possible appeals we can use to persuade our audience:
- Appeal to logic or logos.
- Appeal to character/credibility or ethos.
- Appeal to emotion or pathos.
The sample response provided in the instructions takes all the appeals into consideration when analyzing John Muir's statement. Let's break it down here:
- He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. - Appeal to logic.
- He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. - Appeal to character.
- Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout. - Appeal to emotion.
Therefore, we can select options A, B, and C as the correct answers for this question.
Learn more about rhetorical appeals here:
brainly.com/question/13734134
#SPJ1
Answer:
i believe it is A, hope this helps :)
Explanation:
In the system of voluntary restriction, if one person takes more than his or her share, it will ruin the system for everyone
