Answer: Liability of $300,000
Explanation:
In the question above, what we have is a deferred tax liability, which could be explained as the amount accrued in taxes at a present time but payable in the future. The tax rate will not be based in the present tax rate. Thus is why we will not be using the 30% tax tate of 2018 in calculating the tax amount.
Tax rate = 40%
Exceeded tax basis = $750,000
0.4 × 750,000 = $300,000
Therefore, Johns-Hopper should report the deferred tax effect of this difference in its December 31, 2018, balance sheet as Liability of $300,000
Answer:
The correct answer is d. Failure to support climate-change treaties.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is a situation in which an apparent operational conflict between two ethical imperatives is presented in such a way that obedience to one of them implies the transgression of the other. In general, it is called an ethical dilemma when an agent (the professional, in this case) has reasons to carry out two actions (or more), each of which favors a different principle, and it is not possible to fulfill them without violating any of they. In this way, the agent is in a situation in which he is condemned to commit a foul: no matter what he does, he will do something "wrong" or will miss an obligation.
Deposit (PV): $10,000
Years between the 18th month and the fifth year (n) = 3.5
(I)=7% yearly interest rate
Simple interest approach accumulated value equals P*(1+(i*n)).
=1000*(1+(7%*3.5))
=1245
Thus, the total value at the end of five years will be $1245.
Compound interest method accumulated value equals P*(1+i)n
=1000*(1+7%)^3.5
=1267.19
Therefore, the total value after five years will be $1267.19.
Learn more about simple interest here ;
brainly.com/question/25845758
#SPJ4
Answer:
Managers must ensure that their individual goals and work - as well as that of their direct reports - is in line with the overarching strategy. Then, you can ensure that your people are driving progress daily. Proper strategic alignment ensures the work of your best talent is being effectively and efficiently utilized
Answer and Explanation:
a)
If you charge $40 for X then everyone will buy as everyone is willing to pay atleast $40. this means all three groups buy that is 3*1000 buyers.So profit from X = 3000*40= $120,000
And since everyone is willing to willing to pay atleast $60 for Y again all three groups will buy so profit from Y =3000*60=$180,000
profits=$300,000
b)
If you charge $90 and $160 for X and Y respectively you will have only 1000 buyers for each product as others are unwilling to pay this much.
So profits = 1000*90 + 1000*160=$250,000
c)
for a bundle of X and Y buyers are willing to pay a total of $150, $210 and $200 across the three categories.
So everyone will buy a bundle of 1 X and 1 Y.
profits = 150*3000= $450,000
d)
If you charge $210 only the second will buy as they are willing to pay that much so profits =1000*210=$210,000
Also by selling X at $90 group 1 will buy X; profits=1000*90=$90,000
and by selling Y at $160 group 3 will buy Y; profits=1000*160=$160,000
total profits =$460,000
