Answer:
C) 0.5 USD
Explanation:
Swap is an arrangement in which two parties exchange their interest rates for mutual benefit. One party may receive fixed rate and other will receive floating rate based on LIBOR. In the given scenario the swap agreement was originated when the LIBIOR was 3%. The fixed rate was set to be at 4% so the net gain at the time of inception was 1%. When LIBOR increased after six month the net gain declined to only 0.5%.
nearly 41.1 percent of every dollar they earn in taxes.
the required details about taxes is given in below link
In the United States, the primary source of tax revenue was from individual income taxes (federal, state, and municipal).
sources of US tax revenue.
The United States relies substantially more on individual income taxes and property taxes than the OECD average. Individual income taxes generated 41.1 percent of total tax revenue in the United States, compared to an average of 24 percent in OECD countries—a 17.1 percentage point differential.
This is mainly due to the fact that in the United States, more than half of business income is reported on individual tax returns. In comparison to other OECD nations, the United States' method of taxing business income increases the share of tax revenue from individual income taxes and decreases the share of tax revenue from corporate taxes.
to know more about US tax revenue.
brainly.com/question/27978084
#SPJ4
Answer:
the answer is B
Explanation:
because there are less things in the number and if this dos not help you I am sorry I am not good at math
The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services is the agency responsible for approving a state's special education plan and releasing the IDEA funds accordingly. These offices also help schools understand the services and responsibilities. These services help with those who have a learning disability or need specialized attention/help in school.
Answer:
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
Explanation:
If change in Price in Rental Company A doesn't necessitate change in prices in Rental companies B.C.D.E & F
Then the products A has on offer are not close substitutes to the rival companies
However where Rental company G lowers his price and it immediately triggers a Price reduction in Companies B to F, then obviously they offer similar products that are close substitutes and serve similar segment or channel of the Market Size. Thus failure to lower their Price will automatically see Customers rent cars more from Company G.
This situation is an example of cross Price elasticity of Demand
