Answer:
The choices are as follows:
a. breach of contract.
b.breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment.
c.breach of warranty.
d.negligence
Explanation:
The answer is D. Negligence.
Most of the time when these types of facilities are being developed it must be in accordance with the local law and environmental laws. There are times that these are followed but the adherence to public safety are ignored.
Although the environmental impact assessment and other laws may be fulfilled the consideration for the public is a moral one. On this basis, Ned is within his rights to sue the company on the claim of morality and humanity alone.
D. Restitution
Restitution is the concept that an offender may use financial means to repair the damage done to the victim.
Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
