Which conclusion is best supported by the bloodstains in the victim's bedroom?

1 answer:

8 0

Depending on the spread of the bloodstain.
Blood stain that spread in large distance within small pebbles usually indicates a hard force such as blunt weapons attack or bullets
If the bloodstain is gushing down like a pool, it indicates a stabbing incidents using sharp objects.

You might be interested in

Three pedestrian behaviors that could lead to collisions with vehicles?

Rasek [7]

Answer:

1: people not being aware by crossing the road while it is busy 2: people obstructing the road 3: a person could have gotten out of their car and still been in the road

6 0

3 years ago

Davey clearly acted defensively when he was told that he is using the Internet too much. He was showing low emotional intelligen

algol13

Answer:

In this situation Davey could start his statement by saying:

Ok, I understand this argument bothers me because it would break my habits.

Explanation:

All right, to understand this case we need to observe everything. Davey has developed a dependency or in other words an addiction. To change it we need to make him understand his dependency has changed his life and impacted it negatively. Only then he will understand and accept it, he needs to accept it before making a progress. Then, he will be able to recognize its condition. Then, he needs to understand that the negative emotions he feels are the obstacle to his progress and the break of that habit. So he needs to start his statement by accepting his condition. Then he will reframe it and build from it.

4 0

2 years ago

The Jay Treaty expressed the political beliefs of

storchak [24]

Thomas Jefferson was against the treaty so you can rule them answers out. Thomas Jefferson also formed the Democratic-Republican party so you can get rid of them answers as well leaving just George Washington and the Federalist to be the only answer!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Asch demonstrated that group unanimity exerted an influence on conformity, above group size alone. question 1 options: true.

Lorico [155]

The statement is TRUE.

In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to measure the dynamics of group-thinking. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity.

Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that increasing group size by up to three times, raised the conformity levels to 32%. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.

This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.

Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

What did Jesus teach were the most important commandments? Select all that apply.

pantera1 [17]

A,c is the answers that your looking for

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers