Answer:
perfect competition; equal to $15
Explanation:
A Perfect competition industry is characterised by :
1. Firms that are price takers - They do not set price but prices are set by the forces of demand and supply.
2. Prices are equal to marginal revenue and average revenue.
3. plenty buyers and sellers.
4 free entry and exist of firms.
A monopolistic industry is chartcerised by :
1. Firms that are price makers.
2. Plenty buyers and sellers.
3. Price and average revenue are less than the marginal revenue
A monopoly is characterised by :
1. Firms that are price makers.
2. One seller
3. Price and average revenue are less than the marginal revenue
Answer:
Answer to this is both option (i) and option (iii).
Explanation:
Change in technology generally affects the change in productivity as well as the change in labor demand. In the case of Labor-augmenting (improving) technology, it is found that the positive change in technology leads to the increasing marginal productivity of labor. This increase of marginal productivity of labor shifts the labor-demand curve towards right. Thus, Labor-augmenting (improving) technology causes marginal productivity of labor to increase which further leads to shifting of the labor-demand curve towards right.
Answer:
Alpha Kappa Psi is among the largest business student organizations on campus. Known for developing principled business leaders, Alpha Kappa Psi is the world's oldest business fraternity.
Good habits:
Be organized- Have all materials needed in study area
Bad Habits:
Do not leave harder or more challenging question for the last- knock out easier assignments early when you are fresh
Answer: True
Explanation:
Under Agency Law in relation to employment, the salesperson is acting as an agent of the owner of the store and as such is their representative. As their representative, it is assumed that whatever they are selling is from the Owner whom they represent and as such can be binding on the owner.
This is why the Agent must act in the best interest of the owner because the owner could be held negligent for the actions of their agents. For instance, a salesperson will not be sued for a faulty equipment that caused harm but the store can.