<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Group is the collection of multiple people. So, there must be more than two people to form a group.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>The most important feature to form a group is to have the common point of interest and goal among the members. </em> This makes the involvement of group members in right way building a good relation among them.
It is important to have the healthy interaction among the group members to meet the ultimate goal of the group. <em>Also the interdependency among the members is essential.</em>
Esmeralda fell of her skateboard and needed help. she would be least likely to get immediate help if her accident happened at a busy interaction.
According to a social psychological hypothesis known as the "bystander effect" or "bystander apathy," people are less inclined to assist a victim when other people are around. Since it was first introduced in 1964, a great deal of study, primarily in the lab, has concentrated on a wide range of topics, including the number of bystanders, ambiguity, group cohesion, and the dispersion of blame that supports mutual denial. However, if a group is required to complete the task, each member will have a weak sense of responsibility and will frequently shrink back in the face of difficulties or responsibilities. If a single individual is asked to complete the task alone, the sense of responsibility will be strong, and there will be a positive response.
To learn more about bystander effect click here:
brainly.com/question/3156006
#SPJ9
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States is not a direct democracy, in the sense of a country in which laws (and other government decisions) are made predominantly by majority vote. Some lawmaking is done this way, on the state and local levels, but it’s only a tiny fraction of all lawmaking. But we are a representative democracy, which is a form of democracy.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The grocery had the duty to use due care to stay its premises during a reasonably safe condition for invitees or to warn them of a hazard. Whether a condition constitutes a danger may be a function of reasonableness. That is, if the ordinarily prudent man could foresee that harm was a possible results of a condition, then it's a danger. the shop knew or should have known that water was present and continuing to accumulate on the ground, and that they negligently did not remove the water.
