Explanation:
The witness's testimony is inadmissible.
Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.
The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.
These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.
In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
A victim and his former business.
Answer:If I had to guess, it would be Psychodynamic psychotherapy (Psychodynamic therapy). But I’m not completely sure!
Explanation:
Superstition is a belief or notion, not based on reasons or knowledge, in or of the ominous significance of a particular thing, circumstance, occurring, proceeding, or the like. To overcome superstition, figure out reality and cling to it. Reality is what the five senses—touch, sight, sound, smell, and taste—allow us to perceive. It is not reality if none of those can comprehend it. Remember that there are restrictions at this time. One cannot quickly grasp the distant past. For instance, I reject the existence of gods or invisible, immaterial entities since there is no proof for them. However, since fossilized dinosaur bones have been discovered all throughout the world, I assume that they actually existed. In other words, there is proof that they formerly existed.
Answer: The cultivation effect.
Explanation:
The cultivation effect theory as proposed by George Gerbner explains how the role of the media can influence people's perception of the world over long exposure.According to this theory, people who constantly watch television are more susceptible to be influenced by media messages and which in no time aligns with their thoughts and how they view the world around them.
Therefore for example in the question, If someone constantly watches a lot of violent and crime movies eg law and order, his or her perception of the environment will change regardless of living in an area void of violent crime rates.
